-
Annotated by:
- Clark, Mark
- Date of entry: Jul-28-2016
Summary
“Tithonus” is a dramatic monologue that imagines the once
handsome, magnificent Trojan prince to be well-advanced in an unfortunate state
brought about by negligent gods and his own lack of foresight. Exultant over the blessings of his youth,
he’d asked Aurora, goddess of the dawn, for eternal life, and she had obtained
Zeus’s permission to grant the request.
But Tithonus had failed to ask for eternal youth with his immortality—and
neither Aurora nor Zeus had managed to recognize that this feature of the
request might be important—so that Tithonus spends eternity growing
increasingly decrepit. In Tennyson’s
poem, Tithonus addresses Aurora, hoping he might persuade her to reassign him
his mortal status and allow him to die.
Primary Source
Tennyson’s Poetry
Publisher
Norton (Critical Edition)
Place Published
New York, NY
Edition
1971
Page Count
2
Commentary
While the condition of the speaker encourages us to draw analogies to elder experience, the more fundamental emotional contemplation probably relates to debilitating grief. Tennyson wrote the first version of the poem when he was in his early 20s, shortly after the death of his beloved friend, Arthur Hallam. In some ways, the poem is a bitter, despairing rejection of William Wordsworth’s encouragements to seek healing in through exercises of memory. At the limit of aging or of grief, Tennyson responds, memory is only a tortuous reminder of all one can no longer have.
In the poem, as Tithonus makes use of his memory, he echoes—in profound anxiety—the adage of the human community that “The Gods themselves cannot recall their gifts” (l. 49), in which case, Aurora cannot take back the immortality she has bestowed. As Tithonus uses his memory, though, the word “recall” (in the adage) strikes him, it seems, as a double-entendre (as critic Herbert Tucker has recognized)—related to memory as well as taking back. Following the insight, Tithonus launches once more into recollection, suspecting that he is discovering a difference between Aurora and him: if he is able to “recall,” then he cannot be a god and must be mortal. The excruciating irony here, however, is that as he persists in exercising his recollection, he re-asserts his human being, renewing his human life and contributing, therefore, to the realization of his immortality. He proves complicit with Aurora in preserving the life from which he hopes to be delivered.
The poem is devastatingly dark, but readers gain from it an experience of the lingering pain of mourning’s inescapability. The lines of Tithonus addressing the ever-returning day are surely some of the finest in the language, capturing as they do the state of the aged-in-demise or of those in deep mourning: