Losing Thomas & Ella: A Father's Story
Weaver-Hightower, Marcus
Primary Category:
Literature /
Nonfiction
Secondary Category:
Literature /
Genre: Graphic Memoir
-
Annotated by:
- DiLeonardo, Olivia
- Date of entry: Aug-23-2020
Summary
Dr. Weaver-Hightower wrote, illustrated, and published
this powerful graphic work in the Journal of Medical Humanities. The comic itself is presented in a traditional
paneled format, with a few exceptions, and rendered in a moody ink wash in
black, white, and various shades of darker and lighter greys. The story is told
in the authentic, sometimes faltering voice, of the father of Thomas and Ella,
a pair of twin infants who died at 22 and 24 weeks into pregnancy. Beginning
with their harrowing trip to the hospital, the comic describes the father and
mother’s loss of Ella, shortly after she was born prematurely; their subsequent
wait for Thomas to reach the “viable” age of 24 weeks; his stillbirth; and the
couple’s sudden discharge from the hospital, going home with “empty arms”. The story then transitions into “The Long
After”, including the funeral and the phases of the parents’ grieving
process. The father describes his grief,
frustrations, the couple’s differing ways of coping, and his ambivalence and
anger toward religion as a source of comfort or deeper understanding. On the last page, he recounts their hopes and
fears as they enter into their second pregnancy, concluding with panels of the father
wrestling with how to understand and process this loss. The final panel is an image of the father in
profile, expressionless, saying nothing, a fitting conclusion to a story for
which words seem to fail.
With this piece, the author introduces us to
the genre of the “research comic”. The comic is followed by a methodological
appendix, which explains the author’s process for choosing, capturing, and
relating this history in words and illustrations, as well as his rationale for
selecting a comic or graphic memoir format for the piece. The author also elaborates upon the concept
of the comic as a form of “rigorous, informative research” (226). The appendix is very interesting and will
satisfy the curiosity of readers asking the questions, “How did he do this?”,
or “Why is this story a comic?”, but the piece stands on its own without the
appendix, as well.
Miscellaneous
This graphic memoir also appears in Journal of Medical
Humanities 2017:38(215-230).
Publisher
Penn State University Press
Place Published
University Park, PA
Edition
2018
Page Count
129-140
Commentary