-
Annotated by:
- Woodcock, John
- Date of entry: Jan-12-1999
Summary
Charlie Gordon is a young man with an IQ of 68 who has a job at a box factory and attends night classes in an effort to improve himself. A (very fictional) experimental brain operation becomes available that promises to triple intelligence (it has already done so for a mouse named Algernon), and Charlie excitedly decides that he wants to give it a try. The story consists solely of Charlie's diary entries from the time he hears about the operation through the operation and his dramatic increase, and subsequent decrease, of IQ.
Charlie's increased intelligence opens up to him the understanding of everyday things that had been beyond his grasp, and at his peak he soars to the level of genius, ironically identifying the flaw in the scientific work of the two scientists who developed the operation he has undergone, and thus destroying their careers as their shallow research destroys the life that had been his.
Among the everyday things Charlie understands for the first time is the fact that two of his male co-workers have regularly taken advantage of his retarded state to make fun of him, sometimes roughly. Charlie also becomes self-conscious more generally, which makes it impossible for him to stay in the place where he has been so degraded, even after his formerly misbehaving pals become sympathetic.
At the end of the story he has fallen back to his original level of intelligence--and may continue to decline, if we take the suggestion from the fate of his fellow subject, Algernon, who rises, falls, and then dies. Charlie has only a dim memory of having done something important. His self-esteem is strong, however, and he decides to leave his familiar world and find a place where people won't know about his embarrassment.
Miscellaneous
Primary Source
The Science Fiction Hall of Fame, vol 1
Publisher
Avon
Place Published
New York
Edition
1971
Editor
Robert Silverberg
Page Count
30
Commentary
This is a literary-medical gem that many people read in junior high and find well worth another reading in college. It is funny, sentimental, and serious, and can serve as the starting place for any number of broad discussions of medical issues. The most obvious are the least interesting: no one today would do an operation on a human being that had been tried on a single mouse--and no one should rush through the process of informed consent with a subject whose IQ is 68.
Charlie's story raises some significant issues, however, that are not deflated by its science-fictionish operation. The key to understanding these issues is that Charlie's fall does not simply leave him where he was before the operation. As for Adam in the Garden of Eden, to whom Keyes makes several allusions, for Charlie access to new understanding changes his life to such a degree that he is forced to leave it for something much less certain.
What Charlie's story makes us ask is, first, among abnormalities, which ones ought to be cured, which left as is? And then, what constitute satisfactory cures for those we set out to cure? These are core questions in medicine that depend strongly on person and culture, on the life beyond the technical complaint. This deceptively simple story raises them for us in telling and useful ways.